4 AI Coach prompts you should be trying to drive performance ↓ 1️⃣ When you want to give better feedback: “I need to deliver feedback to [a direct report who is technically strong but frequently interrupts others in meetings]. Draft a conversation script using the SBI (Situation, Behavior, Impact) model. Ensure the tone is [supportive yet firm about the need for behavioral change]. The direct report should leave this conversation with [potential next steps for growth and future improvement].” 2️⃣ When you don’t know what to do with survey results: “Give me three recommended actions to help improve [themes from survey, e.g., motivation or recognition, tailored to our team function]. These recommendations should be realistic for a team [with limited capacity as well as visible and meaningful to leadership]. Include key KPIs to track, any relevant constraints or assumptions, and potential risks or pitfalls to avoid when implementing each action.” 3️⃣ When you want to communicate clearly through change: “I am a [VP of HR], and I need to announce a significant organizational change to [fellow senior leaders]. Without specific company-identifying details, help me draft an outline for my message. Suggest key points to cover to help me acknowledge what is known, what is still uncertain, and potential questions my team may have. The audience should understand the impact of this change on [employee sentiment] and [our bottom line]. Maintain a caring, thoughtful, and clear tone. At the end, list any additional information you would normally ask for to make this outline even stronger.” 4️⃣ When you want to take action, but don’t know where to start: “Other than declining engagement scores or rising attrition, what are the early warning signs that [employee experience] is deteriorating in a [company like ours – include industry/size if helpful]? Focus on leading indicators that a [senior leader] would observe directly, such as changes in manager behavior, team dynamics, or qualitative feedback. Based on these, suggest [three low-cost] actions a leadership team could take, and outline a simple plan for putting them into practice.” We’ve got more where that came from here: https://lnkd.in/gTddVYdj
4 AI Coach Prompts for Performance Improvement
More Relevant Posts
-
🤖 AI is not replacing managers. But it is redefining what a great manager looks like. For years, a significant part of a manager's role has been informational. Tracking progress. Reporting status. Cascading decisions. Monitoring performance. ✅ AI is taking over much of that. And faster than most organisations expected. So what's left? The parts that were always the most important — and the least developed: → 🎯 Having the difficult conversation nobody else will have. → 🌱 Noticing when someone on the team is quietly struggling. → 👂 Creating the kind of psychological safety where people speak up before problems escalate. → 🔄 Coaching for growth — not just managing for output. These aren't soft skills. They're the hardest skills. And they've always been what separates a good manager from a great one. AI doesn't change that. It makes it impossible to ignore. 💡 When the administrative layer gets thinner, what remains is pure leadership. The question is whether organisations are investing in developing it — or just assuming it will happen on its own. What do you think is the most important skill for managers to develop in an AI-driven workplace? #AIinHR #FutureOfWork #Leadership #ChangeManagement #HRTransformation #PeopleFirst #ManagerDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Human-Centred Leadership in the AI Era: Why Leadership Development is Failing the Modern Workplace We are living in the most technologically advanced era in human history — yet workplaces across the world are experiencing disengagement, burnout, toxic cultures, distrust in leadership, and emotional disconnection at unprecedented levels. How is this possible? Every year, global research institutions, business schools, HR centres of excellence, consulting firms, and even Masters and PhD students produce thousands of papers, frameworks, and leadership models around: * Human-centred leadership * Servant leadership * Courageous leadership * Purpose-driven leadership * People-first leadership * Ethical leadership * Inclusive leadership We build leadership academies, leadership labs, design digital learning journeys, roll out e-learning platforms, self-paced courses. Yet somehow, we expect traditional managers — many shaped by command-and-control systems, profit obsession, operational pressure, technical performance metrics — to miraculously transform overnight into emotionally intelligent, human-centred leaders. How? Leadership is not downloaded like software. Mindset shifts are not achieved through a two-hour e-learning module. Human behaviour cannot be transformed by compliance-based leadership frameworks. The uncomfortable truth is this: Many organisations continue promoting technically competent individuals into leadership positions without ever assessing whether they possess the emotional maturity, empathy, courage, self-awareness or relational intelligence required to lead human beings. We promote individuals from: Managing self → managing others → managing functions → managing business → managing enterprise… Yet nowhere in this progression do we seriously ask: Can this person lead adults with dignity, trust, humanity, psychological safety? In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, leadership is no longer just about operational excellence. AI is already performing many managerial tasks: * AI-generated performance reviews * Predictive workforce analytics * Automated reporting * Employee sentiment analysis * Recruitment screening * Productivity monitoring * Workflow optimisation If AI can increasingly perform transactional management functions, then what remains uniquely human about leadership? Everything. The future leader will not compete with AI on data processing,they will be distinguished by humanity: * Courage during uncertainty * Ethical decision-making * Empathy in moments of crisis * Trust-building, Inclusion * Emotional intelligence * Meaning-making * Culture shaping Culture is not built by technology. Culture is built by leadership behaviour. In this AI era, leadership will either become the greatest competitive advantage for organisations — or the greatest risk to employee engagement, trust, innovation, and human sustainability. Are are we simply rebranding outdated management practices with modern leadership terminology!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝑴𝒚 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝑰 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑳𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 For years I thought leadership was about experience, intuition, and presence. Then AI came in not as a replacement, but as a mirror that reflects leaders back to themselves more clearly. As an executive coach, I now see AI not as a threat to leadership, but as a tool that changes 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 as leaders. It doesn’t judge people, but it highlights patterns in decisions, communication, and behavior that many leaders never see on their own. That helps me design more precise coaching journeys, without losing the human essence of the work. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐀𝐈 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐲 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 I use AI to analyze language patterns in a leader’s messages, reports, and reflections. It reveals recurring themes control, hesitation, blame, or openness so I can ask sharper questions: “𝘐 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘢𝘺 ‘𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦.’ 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨?” AI doesn’t label the leader; it gifts me better starting points for the conversation. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥𝐬 Leaders often say, “I feel like I’m changing,” but struggle to see evidence. I now use AI‑supported check‑ins and short reflections between sessions. Over time, the data shows more clarity and better decision‑making,. Leaders see their own growth, not just believe it. 𝐒𝐞𝐥𝐟‑𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐬 AI can generate 100 frameworks in 10 seconds, but that’s not what leaders need most. Instead, I use AI to craft deep reflection prompts that help leaders move from reaction to awareness “𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘭𝘺. 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯?” 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞, 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 Between notes, summaries, and follow‑ups, I used to spend hours managing the process. AI now helps me organize key insights and prepare resources faster. That frees me to show up more present, attentive, and fully human in every session. 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐈‑𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 AI cannot listen with compassion. It cannot sit in silence with a leader who is struggling. But can help me notice more, prepare better, and stay more focused on the person, not the process. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐈 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞? 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐱𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧‑𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡? استخدم الذكاء الاصطناعي في عملي كمدرب وقائد كـ"مُصفي أنماط" لا كحكم. أستخدمه لفهم أساليب القيادة، رصد التقدم، وصياغة أسئلة تأمل عميقة، مع الحفاظ على الاتصال الإنساني في الصدارة. AI لا يُعيد تعريف القيادة؛ بل يُعلي من مستوى الوعي والمسؤولية لدى القادة.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Last month I gave a CEO his first coaching homework. He looked at it and said: "This is it?" The assignment: Use an AI app every evening this week. For something completely personal. Work stuff: forbidden. By the end of week 1, he came back with more confidence and a completely different way of thinking about what AI could do inside his business. Here's what the data tells us and why this matters. → Anthropic's latest labor market research shows a wide gap between what AI could theoretically help with and what people actually use it for at work. → McKinsey reports the same pattern from the organisational side: many companies still aren't set up for day-to-day AI adoption, and a large number don't even have a clear C-level owner for it. The gap is about confidence. And you can't build confidence under pressure, with an audience, with your credibility on the line. That's why I don't start with work tasks. → Organize date night based on your partner’s preference → Build a personal accountant that flags where the money goes. → Get a bedtime story for your kids every night, based on favorite characters. Every single one builds something critical: The instinct to reach for AI when there's a problem to solve. That instinct is what's missing in most leadership teams. Leaders keep treating AI like an enterprise initiative: something to delegate, sponsor, and review in a quarterly update. But you can't lead a habit you don't have. Once AI becomes exciting at home, it becomes natural at work. That's the shift. A practical experiment (10 minutes tonight): 1/ Pick one personal task you'd normally just Google 2/ Do it with an AI app on your phone instead 3/ Notice what surprised you 4/ Use that surprise in your next team conversation about AI That's the move from AI sponsor to AI practitioner. And that gap is the real leadership gap right now. Question: what's one thing in your personal life where AI would genuinely save you time, but you've never thought to try it?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Your leadership operating system is outdated I’ve been watching leaders add AI to their teams like it’s just another tool in the stack. But there is something missing…if you haven’t evolved how you lead, you’re essentially running new hardware on obsolete software. And I think AI isn’t replacing your people, it’s exposing which of us never really saw our people in the first place. Think about it. When AI handles the routine tasks, what’s left is the human work… creative problem-solving, emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, innovation. If you’ve been treating your team like robots completing tasks, you’re about to discover you have failed as a leader. You optimised for compliance, not capability. But if you’ve been investing in your people’s growth, curiosity, and autonomy? You’re about to surpass those around you. The shift required isn’t small. You can’t manage humans the way you prompt AI, and you can’t develop AI the way you develop humans. Blur this line and you’ll fail at both. So what do I think you need to do? Three things… 1️⃣Redefine productivity from output to outcome Stop measuring your people by how busy they look or how many tasks they check off. AI will win that game every single time. Instead, I’m encouraging you to evaluate the quality of their thinking, the questions they’re asking, and the problems they’re choosing to solve. Create actual space for your team to think, not just do. 2️⃣Become a capability architect, not a task manager Your role isn’t to assign and track work anymore. It’s to identify what uniquely human skills your team needs to develop and create environments where those skills can flourish. Ask yourself: what can my people do that AI never will? Then build that intentionally. 3️⃣Practice transparent experimentation Your team is watching how you navigate this uncertainty. Stop pretending you have all the answers, I certainly don’t. Share what you’re learning, what’s working, what isn’t. Model the adaptive mindset you need them to have. I genuinely believe vulnerability is the right leadership strength throughout this… The AI era doesn’t need better managers. It needs leaders who understand that technology amplifies culture. If your culture is extractive, AI will just extract faster. If your culture is developmental, AI will accelerate that growth. If you are struggling whilst others around you seem like they have got their shit together… Either you are not looking hard enough or you need support. Confused about how your leadership can evolve, drop me a DM and let’s see how we can work together.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Self-silencing is a hidden performance issue. It affects meetings, leadership, feedback, innovation, conflict resolution and trust. Many capable professionals do not withhold truth because they lack insight. They withhold truth because their internal system associates speaking with danger. This can come from previous experiences: Being dismissed. Being punished. Being misunderstood. Being labelled is difficult. Being ignored. Being made to feel foolish. So the person learns to edit. Then over-edit. Then disappear. In organisations, this creates hidden costs. Important truth stays unsaid. Poor decisions go unchallenged. Resentment grows. Teams become polite but unclear. Leaders receive compliance instead of real feedback. At InnocentMINDS, we help leaders and professionals work with voice, state, identity and behavioural structure. The goal is not loudness. The goal is clean, steady, useful truth. Online / Virtual NLP Practitioner Non-Certification Training enrolment closes in a few days. Send a DM to ask questions, confirm fit, or explore one-on-one work. Innocent Usar Behavioural Architect Founder, InnocentMINDS Training & Consulting (InnocentMINDS Institute for Behavioural Architecture) #LeadershipDevelopment #Communication #SelfLeadership #InnocentMINDS #Boundaries
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Practical Way to Breakout of the AI Trap: Why Leaders Fail and Individuals Worry About Job Displacement Continuum of Transformation: Organizational mindset → Professional reinvention → Leadership clarity → Executive wisdom. The AI era is reshaping work and leadership. Yet many leaders fall into traps that erode judgment and stall innovation, while individuals worry about displacement and relevance. The practical way forward is not panic, but progression: begin with a change in mindset, then deepen development through pathways that strengthen judgment, adaptability, and wisdom. The following published works together form a continuum of transformation: 📘 Why Smart Companies Fail at AI (Lim See Yew) explores why organizations collapse when they remain trapped in factory logic, treating AI as bolt‑on automation instead of redesigning work. It provides a practical diagnosis of failure and a call to rethink systems and leadership at their core. 👉 Why Smart Companies Fail at AI: https://lnkd.in/gNs-rbFf 📗 Ageless Employability (Lim See Yew) shows how individuals can remain relevant and thrive across decades of change. It reinforces the consulting mindset shift, offering practical strategies for sustaining careers with adaptability and wisdom. 👉 Ageless Employability: https://lnkd.in/gAFVugs9 Once this foundation is set, readers can choose verticals that deepen their development depending on their focus: 1. Factory Logic → Hybrid Intelligence - The AI Skill Flip (Sheamus McGovern) demonstrates how professionals can practically reinvent work by treating AI as co‑worker, co‑pilot, and co‑designer. It emphasizes Hybrid Intelligence — human judgment plus machine scale — to achieve innovation. 👉 The AI Skill Flip: https://lnkd.in/gv5fUJCZ 2. Working Mindset → Consulting Mindset - The Rising Leader Handbook (Mark J. Silverman) equips professionals to break away from execution and move into judgment, coaching, and consulting. It provides practical exercises for resilience, delegation, and influence. 👉 The Rising Leader Handbook: https://lnkd.in/gYnHV7Ck 3. Judgment → Wisdom (Co‑Design Mindset) - The AI Executive’s Handbook (Misha Sulpovar) extends this shift to the C‑suite, guiding executives to embed governance, ethics, and wisdom into AI strategy so innovation scales sustainably. 👉 The AI Executive’s Handbook: https://lnkd.in/grJqSi_h Together, these works form a practical playbook for transformation and caring for leaders and professionals navigating the AI era, offering both a clear diagnosis of the traps and practical ways to break free. It is also about celebrating the collective wisdom of authors who are helping us all move forward with confidence.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The danger with AI is not that it thinks. It’s that we, humans, stop thinking the moment something sounds convincing. We’re entering a strange phase of leadership in which polished outputs are perceived as sound judgment. Clean formatting. Confident tone. Fast answers. And suddenly, nobody wants to question the conclusion. That’s where the risk begins. In the latest Forbes Coaches Council Expert Panel, our own Alla Adam calls this “phantom confidence”: 👉 “Leaders see polished AI outputs and assume the thinking behind them is equally solid. The real issue isn’t the tool; it’s the temptation to skip judgment. What helps is forcing one human checkpoint before action: Someone must challenge the conclusion, not just admire and admit the answer.” That pause matters. Because speed without thinking can create blind spots. And blind spots at scale become very expensive decisions. At Adam Impact Institute, we see the strongest leaders using AI as an expansion tool and never a replacement for judgment. They pressure-test. They challenge assumptions. They ask better questions before moving faster. That’s the difference. If you’re integrating AI into leadership, operations, or decision-making, this panel is well worth your time. More insights here ➡️ https://lnkd.in/evGWGnUJ #coaching #mentoring #success #AI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As AI becomes more embedded in the workplace, the skills that rise in value are the ones that help leaders navigate complexity with other humans. https://hubs.li/Q04dX7-q0 Written by Gina Martin, PCC of Gina Martin Coaching & Consulting
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Bad managers want their team to fail (in AI) Good managers empower them to thrive. And I’ve seen who actually gets 2x results (and much more). Most managers think they’re using AI right. But their teams feel the opposite. Same tools. Same access. Still stuck, slow, and dependent. And they don’t know why. Because this isn’t an AI problem. It’s a management problem. Some teams move fast. Others stall. Not because of AI. But because of who’s leading it. Here’s how good managers empower their team to drive AI transformation: 1/ They train their team to outgrow them Others keep the edge to themselves 2/ They share prompts, workflows, systems Others hide them to look smarter 3/ They treat mistakes as part of the process Others punish them and kill experimentation 4/ They give credit openly Others take it, especially when AI did the heavy lifting 5/ They reinvest saved time into better thinking Others fill it with more tasks 6/ They build tool decisions with the team Others force them top-down 7/ They admit what they don’t know Others pretend and slow everyone down 8/ They define ethics early Others wait for something to break 9/ They expect their team to get better than them Others feel threatened when it happens 10/ They invest in access for everyone Others limit it to stay in control Same AI. Same potential. Different leadership. And here’s the part most people miss: You don’t need better tools to switch sides. You need a different intent. Which one are you choosing next? ♻️ Repost this to help your team spot the difference. 👉 Follow Jonny Tooze for more straight-talk on AI, product, and delivery.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
More from this author
Explore related topics
- How to Give Constructive Feedback in Senior Leadership
- How to Optimize Prompts for Improved Outcomes
- How to Receive Feedback as a Leader
- Tips for Advanced AI Prompting Techniques
- How to Deliver Difficult Feedback as a Leader
- How to Improve AI Responses with Structured Prompts
- How to Deliver Negative Feedback as a Manager
- How to Build AI Readiness for HR Leaders
- How to Improve AI Responses with Clear Requests
- How to Coach Leaders for Lasting Change
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development