Update creating-a-system-versioned-temporal-table.md#7427
Merged
jborsecnik merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:livefrom Mar 28, 2022
Merged
Update creating-a-system-versioned-temporal-table.md#7427jborsecnik merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:livefrom
jborsecnik merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:livefrom
Conversation
Better constraint names in this example, since they must be unique within the database.
Contributor
|
@rjk : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
Contributor
|
@rjk Thank you for catching this. As this issue is likely to impact other code samples in this section, I will probably do the work in an internal PR. |
jborsecnik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2022
undo of prematurely merged PR #7427
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Better constraint names in this example, since they must be unique within the database.
Previously I copied and used the existing example and later realised it was a bad constraint name. Better to have a good example, i.e. a properly unique constraint name.